SNo. |
VIGMIS Case Code |
Lapses |
Penalty imposed (Major / Minor) |
Work Type |
1 |
1133 |
The CO (as AAO) violated provisions of Section 19 and 19.2 of CPWD Works Manual 2007 as the rate of one tender item was found having over writing in words & figures when the tender was in his custody after opening and he also did not bring such over writing into the notice of the EE while submitting comparative statement as well as tender forwarding memo. |
Major- Under Rule-14 of CCS (CCA) Rules 1965. |
Civil Works |
2 |
1496 (2) |
The CO (as SE) failed to sanction correct rate for the item of CGS sheet and GS Hips & ridges in substituted item violating para 23.3 (1) of CPWD Works Manual 2007, due to which Government suffered a loss of Rs 61,808/-, which was recovered from the contractor after the complainant. |
Minor- Under Rule 16 of CCS(CCA) Rules 1965. |
Civil Works |
3 |
1496 (4) |
The CO [as AE(P) in circle office] processed incorrect analysis of rate of substituted item statement No. III and recommended the same for approval of the SE violating para 3 (iii) of OM No- 18/4/99- S & D/ 25 dated 17.10.2003 and par 23.3(1) of CPWD Works Manual 2007, due to which Govt. suffered a loss of Rs 61,808/-, which was recovered from the contractor after complaint. |
Minor- Under Rule 16 of CCS(CCA) Rules 1965. |
Civil Works |
4 |
1496 (5) |
The CO (as AE) got substituted items executed without prior concurrence of the T.S. authorities (SE) violating Para 23.2.3 (i) of CPWD Works Manual 2007. He also violated Para 23.3 (1) of CPWD Works Manual 2007 and Para 3 (iii) of OM No.18/4/99-S & D/25 dated 17.1.2003 by proposing higher rate of substituted items based on incorrect analysis of rate due to which govt. suffered a loss of Rs 61,808/-. This amount was recovered from the contractor after the complaint. The CO also violated Para 7.5 (g) (i) of CPWD Works Manual 2007 by changing the date of measurement recorded in the MB. |
Minor- Under Rule 16 of CCS(CCA) Rules 1965. |
Civil Works |
5 |
1496 (6) |
The CO (as JE) prepared and proposed higher rate for sanction of substituted item statement III on the basis of incorrect analysis violating Para 23.3 (1) of CPWD Works Manual, 2007, causing overpayment of Rs. 61,808/- to the contractor, the recovery of which was affected after complaint, from the dues pending to the contractor. |
Minor- Under Rule 16 of CCS(CCA) Rules 1965. |
Civil Works |
6 |
1496 (7) |
The CO (as AE) processed incorrect analysis of rate of substituted item statement No. III and recommended for approval of the statement based on incorrect analysis of rate due to which Govt. suffered a loss of Rs 61,808/-, which was recovered from the contractor after complaint. |
Minor- Under Rule 16 of CCS(CCA) Rules 1965. |
Civil Works |
7 |
2234 (3) |
The CO (as EE) forwarded and recommended for sanction of 2nd instalment of mobilization advance of Rs 5.40 crore, without considering the fact that the agency has not submitted any document in support of utilization of Ist mobilization advance of Rs 4.50 Crore. |
Minor- Under Rule 16 of CCS(CCA) Rules 1965. |
Civil Works |
8 |
2630 (1) |
The CO (as AE) did not calculate the conversion fee by adopting the highest rate of land prescribed in para 4 of Circular dated 20.5.2013 ignoring the provisions of the circular. The exercise was done by the CO without proper application of mind and in casual manner which might have wide repercussions in other such cases. |
Minor- Under Rule 16 of CCS(CCA) Rules 1965. |
Civil Works |
9 |
2330 (3) |
The CO (as JE) did not ensure use of timber as per CPWD Specification and hence violated Para 54.2.2 of CPWD Works Manual 2003. He did not ensure quality of materials before use and making payment to the contractor, violating Para 54.4 (ix) of CPWD Works Manual. |
Minor- Under Rule 16 of CCS(CCA) Rules 1965. |
Civil Works |
10 |
1030 (1) |
CO as Chief Engineer approved for purchasing of material for the works amounting to Rs.11,40,651/- which were entrusted to NBCC by the client and the materials became surplus at the site. Thus, CO incurred infructuous expenditure.
CO approved the procurement of some equipment costing Rs.74,40,000/- without any A/A & E/S of the competent authority and thus incurred infructuous expenditure contravening provisions at para 2.1 of CPWD Works Manual 2003.
|
Major- Under Rule-14 of CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 and Rule- 9 of CCS Pension Rules 1972. |
Electrical Works |
11 |
1327 (1) |
The CO (as EE) failed to take specific note of encroachment in 3 nos. govt. quarters in his capacity as Estate Office, which was found during surprise check by CBI. He also failed to take action as per PP Act 1971 and did not pass eviction proceedings. Therefore, CO violated para 2.6.3 (v), P-17 and para 10.1 (iv), Page 52 of CPWD Maintenance Manual 2000 and PP Act 1971. |
Minor- Under Rule 16 of CCS(CCA) Rules 1965. |
Civil Works |
12 |
1327 (4) |
The CO (as AE) failed to detect and report unauthorized occupation of 3 nos. Government quarters, violating Para-20, page 464 of CPWD Manual Vol. I, 1992 Edition and Para 2.6.1 (xiv), page 15 & Para 10.1 Page 51 of CPWD Maintenance Manual 2000, which was detected by CBI during joint surprise check. |
Minor- Under Rule 16 of CCS(CCA) Rules 1965. |
Civil Works |
13 |
1173 (1) |
CO as Chief Engineer approved Supply Orders amounting to Rs.1,41,69,088/- by charging the expenditure to the Main work. There was no provision for such materials in the Main Estimate. CO thus contravened the provisions of para 2.16.1 and 2.17.1 of CPWD Works Manual (2003 edition).
CO approved Supply Orders amounting to Rs. 3,03,47,069/-, for which no formal acceptance by the requisitioning authority of the proposal contained in the Preliminary Estimate (termed as A/A). The scope of work was partly changed by deleting some important items and adding some new items without the approval of the accepting authority. CO thus contravened the provisions of para 2.6 of CPWD Works Manual (2003 edition) by not taking approval from the requisitioning authority of the changed proposals.
|
Major- Under Rule-14 of CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 and Rule- 9 of CCS Pension Rules 1972. |
Electrical Works |
14 |
1201 (1) |
CO while functioning as Superintending Engineer approved supply orders for procurement of electrical items on the note sheet submitted by the EE. Without getting the proposal processed through planning unit in his office and without any verification of rates from the market or the authenticity of the Price Lists which resulted in placement of Supply Orders and payments to the suppliers at rates far higher MRP, thereby causing a huge loss of Rs.1,31,860/-to the Government and corresponding undue pecuniary advantage to the suppliers. |
Major- Under Rule-14 of CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 and Rule- 9 of CCS Pension Rules 1972. |
Electrical Works |
15 |
2237 (1) |
CO entered in to dubious conversation involving transaction of money with representative of firms With whom he had official dealings thereby raising reasonable suspicion on his integrity.
CO made a fixed deposit of Rs.500000/-. However, he did not report this transaction to the prescribed authority. He thus violated rule 18(3) of the CCS (Conduct) Rules 1964.
|
Major- Under Rule-14 of CCS (CCA) Rules 1965. |
Electrical Works |
16 |
1161 (1) |
The works awarded by AD (H) not started by the contractor were revoked by the CO as DD(H) after a gap of 7 months. No provision exist either in CPWD Works Manual 2007 or in the agreement for such action of the CO. The CO has also not test checked the measurements recorded by AD (H) for above mentioned works. This action of the CO has led to making bogus payment of Rs.279734/- to the contractor. |
Proceeded under Rule 14 and awarded minor penalty. |
Civil Works |
17 |
1625 (1) |
The CO as JE(C) has allowed use of PPC cement in place of OPC cement in violation of additional conditions for cement under the agreement and therefore violated para 5.2.1 (i) of CPWD Works Manual 2007. |
Proceeded under Rule 14 and awarded minor penalty. |
Civil Works |